E4D Fellow: Dorothee Spuhler

Sustainable sanitation planning in Nepal and Ethiopia

  

Dorothee Spuhler

 

 

Project duration: 2015 - 2018

 

Supervisor at ETH Zurich

Professor Max Maurer (Chair of Urban Water Systems)

Collaborators   

Dr. Christoph Lüthi, Eawag
PD Günter Langergraber, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

Partner institutions

external page Sandec, Eawag
external page University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

Nepal:
external page Environmental and Public Health Organization (ENPHO)
external page 500B Solutions

Ethiopia:
external page Arba Minch University (AMU)
Arba Minch Town Municipality (AMTM)

 

Project description

Enlarged view: Sanitation Bazaar in Nala, Nepal
Sanitation Bazaar in Nala, Nepal

Much has been invested to improve sanitation coverage worldwide. However, the high number of inoperative facilities shows dramatically that there are some substantial deficits with non-technical issues of their implementation. Conventional sanitation planning has been top-down focusing on toilet provision leaving out other important aspects such as wastewater treatment downstream. This has led to inappropriate technology choice, lack of ownership and a high number of failing projects. The situation is particularly challenging in expanding urban areas of developing countries where most of the current global population growth is taking place.

To select an appropriate and sustainable sanitation system in a given context is a complex multi-criteria decision making problem. As novel technologies emerge, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify the best option. Structured decision-making (SDM) can help to tackle such complex situations by combining environmental engineering and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to identify trade-offs and balancing for opposing interests. So far research was focusing on the selection procedure, assuming that the options to choose from are already given. This thesis aims at providing systematic methods (1) to generate locally appropriate sanitation decision options at the structuring phase; and (2) to quantify performance indicators of a broad range of sanitation systems at the scale of a city as input into the strategic sanitation planning.

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser